Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Sudan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Sudan rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
31st
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Sudan ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.