Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre (Area square)

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre (Area square) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Zimbabwe
0000199020062023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Zimbabwe?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
0 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.