Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre (Area square)

Guinea-Bissau
0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre (Area square) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
0000199020062023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.