Latvia vs Panama: Net Forest conversion — Area — UNFCCC

Latvia
75.26 1000 ha
in 2022
Panama
74.45 1000 ha
in 2021
Latvia rank
24th
Panama rank
25th

Net Forest conversion — Area — UNFCCC over time

  • Latvia
  • Panama
020406080199620092022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 75.26 1000 ha against 74.45 1000 ha in Panama, a difference of 0.81 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.

Latvia ranks 24th and Panama ranks 25th of 58 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 19.7 1000 ha 43.83 1000 ha 24.13 1000 ha Panama
2010s 55.42 1000 ha 30.8 1000 ha 24.63 1000 ha Latvia
2020s 72.38 1000 ha 73.03 1000 ha 0.6442 1000 ha Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — unfccc, Latvia or Panama?
Latvia, at 75.26 1000 ha against 74.45 1000 ha in Panama as of 2022.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — unfccc between Latvia and Panama?
0.81 1000 ha, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for net forest conversion — area — unfccc?
Latvia ranks 24th and Panama ranks 25th of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — UNFCCC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
60 places, 1,735 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).