American Samoa vs Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- American Samoa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 8,894 kt against 0 kt in American Samoa, a difference of 8,894 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 34th and Sudan ranks 36th of 37 groups.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.47 kt | 6,765 kt | 6,755 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 8,393 kt | 8,393 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, American Samoa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 8,894 kt against 0 kt in American Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between American Samoa and Sudan?
- 8,894 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do American Samoa and Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- American Samoa ranks 34th and Sudan ranks 36th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf