Aruba vs Belarus: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Aruba
- Belarus
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 111th and Belarus ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 2,968 kt | 2,968 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 296.81 kt | 296.81 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 1,758 kt | 1,758 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Aruba or Belarus?
- Aruba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Aruba and Belarus?
- 0 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Belarus rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Aruba ranks 111th and Belarus ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf