Belarus vs Belgium: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Belgium
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 296.81 kt | 145.65 kt | 151.16 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,758 kt | 1,753 kt | 5.84 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 360.69 kt | 360.69 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Belarus or Belgium?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Belarus and Belgium?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Belgium?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Belgium rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf