Belgium vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 145.65 kt | 0 kt | 145.65 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1,753 kt | 4,069 kt | 2,317 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 360.69 kt | 1,335 kt | 974.02 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 96th and Latvia ranks 96th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf