Bermuda vs Kuwait: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Bermuda
- Kuwait
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kuwait, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 111th and Kuwait ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1, Bermuda or Kuwait?
- Bermuda, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1 between Bermuda and Kuwait?
- 0 kt, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Kuwait?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Kuwait rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1?
- Bermuda ranks 111th and Kuwait ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf