Cabo Verde vs Spain: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Cabo Verde
- Spain
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Spain, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 111th and Spain ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 187.37 kt | 187.37 kt | Spain |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Cabo Verde or Spain?
- Cabo Verde, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Cabo Verde and Spain?
- 0 kt, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Spain?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Spain rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Cabo Verde ranks 111th and Spain ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf