China vs Kazakhstan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
China ranks 96th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 294.79 kt | 294.79 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 1,362 kt | 1,362 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2,558 kt | 583.98 kt | 1,974 kt | China |
| 2020s | 1,599 kt | 0 kt | 1,599 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, China or Kazakhstan?
- China, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between China and Kazakhstan?
- 0 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- China ranks 96th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf