China vs Luxembourg: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- China
- Luxembourg
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
China ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.2308 kt | 0.2308 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2,558 kt | 0 kt | 2,558 kt | China |
| 2020s | 1,599 kt | 0 kt | 1,599 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, China or Luxembourg?
- China, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between China and Luxembourg?
- 0 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do China and Luxembourg rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- China ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf