China vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- China
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
China ranks 97th and Uzbekistan ranks 97th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 294.43 kt | 294.43 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 2,558 kt | 32.71 kt | 2,525 kt | China |
| 2020s | 1,599 kt | 0 kt | 1,599 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, China or Uzbekistan?
- China, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between China and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China and Uzbekistan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- China ranks 97th and Uzbekistan ranks 97th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf