Czechia vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Czechia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 218 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,260 kt | 93.3 kt | 2,166 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1,130 kt | 46.65 kt | 1,083 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Czechia or South Sudan?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Czechia and South Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf