Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Net Forest conversion — Emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
156,015 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
59,157 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 156,015 kt against 59,157 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 96,858 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 2.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 21 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 369,228 kt 50,832 kt 318,396 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 369,247 kt 50,832 kt 318,415 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 374,824 kt 54,162 kt 320,662 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 156,167 kt 59,157 kt 97,010 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 156,015 kt against 59,157 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
96,858 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 21 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Net Forest conversion — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Net Forest conversion — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,006 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf