Germany vs Monaco: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Germany
- Monaco
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 111th and Monaco ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1, Germany or Monaco?
- Germany, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Monaco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1 between Germany and Monaco?
- 0 kt, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Monaco?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Monaco rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1?
- Germany ranks 111th and Monaco ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf