Haiti vs Russia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Haiti
- Russia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Russia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.
Haiti ranks 119th and Russia ranks 119th of 252 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 7,530 kt | 7,530 kt | Russia |
| 2000s | 77.89 kt | 753.02 kt | 675.13 kt | Russia |
| 2010s | 352.6 kt | 0 kt | 352.6 kt | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Haiti or Russia?
- Haiti, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Haiti and Russia?
- 0 kt, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Russia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Haiti ranks 119th and Russia ranks 119th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf