Jordan vs Kuwait: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Jordan
- Kuwait
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.502 kt against 0 kt in Kuwait, a difference of 0.502 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kuwait ahead.
Jordan ranks 110th and Kuwait ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.3765 kt | 0 kt | 0.3765 kt | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Jordan or Kuwait?
- Jordan, at 0.502 kt against 0 kt in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Jordan and Kuwait?
- 0.502 kt, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kuwait?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Kuwait rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Jordan ranks 110th and Kuwait ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf