Kenya vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Kenya
- Latvia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Kenya ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 11,407 kt | 4,069 kt | 7,338 kt | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 1,335 kt | 1,335 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Kenya or Latvia?
- Kenya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Kenya and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Kenya ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf