Luxembourg vs Tonga: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Luxembourg
- Tonga
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tonga, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2308 kt | 0 kt | 0.2308 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Luxembourg or Tonga?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 0 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Tonga rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Luxembourg ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf