Malta vs Pakistan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Malta
- Pakistan
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 2,408 kt | 2,408 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 2,526 kt | 2,526 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 2,397 kt | 2,397 kt | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Malta or Pakistan?
- Malta, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Malta and Pakistan?
- 0 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Pakistan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Malta ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf