Serbia vs Tonga: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Serbia
- Tonga
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tonga, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 234 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Serbia or Tonga?
- Serbia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Serbia and Tonga?
- 0 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tonga?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tonga rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 234 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf