South Sudan vs Ukraine: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- South Sudan
- Ukraine
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Ukraine, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 119th and Ukraine ranks 119th of 252 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.3 kt | 721.69 kt | 628.39 kt | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 46.65 kt | 360.85 kt | 314.2 kt | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, South Sudan or Ukraine?
- South Sudan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between South Sudan and Ukraine?
- 0 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Ukraine?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Ukraine rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- South Sudan ranks 119th and Ukraine ranks 119th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf