Ukraine vs Yemen: Net Forest conversion — Emissions
Net Forest conversion — Emissions over time
- Ukraine
- Yemen
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Yemen, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Yemen ahead.
Ukraine ranks 96th and Yemen ranks 96th of 212 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 1,930 kt | 0 kt | 1,930 kt | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 791.75 kt | 0 kt | 791.75 kt | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 360.85 kt | 0 kt | 360.85 kt | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions, Ukraine or Yemen?
- Ukraine, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions between Ukraine and Yemen?
- 0 kt, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Yemen?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ukraine and Yemen rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions?
- Ukraine ranks 96th and Yemen ranks 96th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf