Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Peru
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
1st
Peru rank
2nd

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Peru
-50-250255075199120072023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Peru, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Peru ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Peru ranks 2nd of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s 0.1317 % change on previous year 0.0405 % change on previous year 0.0913 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s -0.731 % change on previous year -3.77 % change on previous year 3.03 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s -4.54 % change on previous year 16.11 % change on previous year 20.65 % change on previous year Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Peru?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru?
0 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st and Peru ranks 2nd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/peru/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 5,296 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.