Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Mauritius rank
112th
New Caledonia rank
112th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Mauritius
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 112th and New Caledonia ranks 112th of 168 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
- Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Mauritius ranks 112th and New Caledonia ranks 112th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.