Belgium-Luxembourg vs Costa Rica: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,239 kt against 1,007 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 232 kt.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 73rd and Costa Rica ranks 70th of 252 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 1,239 kt against 1,007 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica?
- 232 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Costa Rica rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 73rd and Costa Rica ranks 70th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf