Luxembourg vs Niue: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq)
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Luxembourg
- Niue
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Niue, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 119th and Niue ranks 119th of 252 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2308 kt | 1.48 kt | 1.25 kt | Niue |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.139 kt | 0.139 kt | Niue |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq), Luxembourg or Niue?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Niue as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) between Luxembourg and Niue?
- 0 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Niue?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Niue rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq)?
- Luxembourg ranks 119th and Niue ranks 119th of 252 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf