Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Micronesia (Federated States of)
0 kt
in 2023
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0 kt
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
119th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
119th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0200400600199020062023

How they compare

Micronesia (Federated States of) currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 119th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 119th of 252 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Micronesia (Federated States of) averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1990s 130.62 kt 87.2 kt 43.42 kt Micronesia (Federated States of)
2000s 130.58 kt 120.74 kt 9.83 kt Micronesia (Federated States of)
2010s 13.06 kt 267.89 kt 254.83 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 0 kt 1.11 kt 1.11 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq), Micronesia (Federated States of) or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Micronesia (Federated States of), at 0 kt against 0 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0 kt, with Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq)?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 119th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 119th of 252 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/micronesia-federated-states-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/micronesia-federated-states-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
285 places, 9,478 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf