Cuba vs Jamaica: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2023
Jamaica
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
94th
Jamaica rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Jamaica
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 94th and Jamaica ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Cuba or Jamaica?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Cuba and Jamaica?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 94th and Jamaica ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.