Czechia vs Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Czechia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Czechia rank
94th
Latvia rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 94th and Latvia ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0021 kt per person | 0.0019 kt per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0.0007 kt per person | 0.0006 kt per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Czechia or Latvia?
- Czechia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Czechia and Latvia?
- 0 kt per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Czechia ranks 94th and Latvia ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.