Eswatini vs Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Eswatini
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Sudan
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
57th
Sudan rank
60th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 60th of 200 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 60th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.