Libya vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Libya
0 kt per person
in 2023
Nepal
0 kt per person
in 2023
Libya rank
91st
Nepal rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Libya
- Nepal
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Libya or Nepal?
- Libya, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Libya and Nepal?
- 0 kt per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Nepal rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Libya ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.