Libya vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Libya
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Libya rank
91st
South Sudan rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Libya
- South Sudan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 91st and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Libya or South Sudan?
- Libya, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Libya and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Libya and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Libya ranks 91st and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.