Luxembourg vs Russia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Luxembourg
0 kt per person
in 2023
Russia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
94th
Russia rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Russia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Russia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 94th and Russia ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Russia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Luxembourg or Russia?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Luxembourg and Russia?
- 0 kt per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Russia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Russia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 94th and Russia ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.