Luxembourg vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Luxembourg
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
94th
South Sudan rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- South Sudan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Luxembourg or South Sudan?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Luxembourg and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.