Mongolia vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Mongolia
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Mongolia rank
94th
South Sudan rank
94th
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Mongolia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Mongolia or South Sudan?
- Mongolia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.