Belgium vs El Salvador: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belgium
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
94th
El Salvador rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • El Salvador
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.

Belgium ranks 94th and El Salvador ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0359 kt per square kilometre 0.0311 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0577 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0541 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0118 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0118 kt per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belgium or El Salvador?
Belgium, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belgium and El Salvador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and El Salvador?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and El Salvador rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 94th and El Salvador ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs El Salvador: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/el-salvador/">Belgium vs El Salvador: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.