Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Brazil
0.1486 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.1366 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
5th
Equatorial Guinea rank
8th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.050.10.150.20.25199020062023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1486 kt per square kilometre against 0.1366 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.012 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2476 kt per square kilometre 0.1366 kt per square kilometre 0.111 kt per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.1805 kt per square kilometre 0.1366 kt per square kilometre 0.0439 kt per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.1194 kt per square kilometre 0.1366 kt per square kilometre 0.0172 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.1412 kt per square kilometre 0.1366 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Brazil or Equatorial Guinea?
Brazil, at 0.1486 kt per square kilometre against 0.1366 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
0.012 kt per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 8th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/equatorial-guinea/">Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.