China vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

China
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
94th
Rwanda rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
00.020.040.06199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0628 kt per square kilometre 0.0628 kt per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0353 kt per square kilometre 0.0353 kt per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, China or Rwanda?
China, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between China and Rwanda?
0 kt per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
China ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.