China vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

China
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
94th
Uzbekistan rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Uzbekistan
0000.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

China ranks 94th and Uzbekistan ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre —
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, China or Uzbekistan?
China, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between China and Uzbekistan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China and Uzbekistan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
China ranks 94th and Uzbekistan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/uzbekistan/">China vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.