El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
94th
Kyrgyzstan rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0359 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0359 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0359 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0359 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
El Salvador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/kyrgyz-republic/">El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.