Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Estonia
0.0222 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0206 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
48th
Guinea-Bissau rank
50th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Estonia
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.0050.010.0150.020.025199020062023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0222 kt per square kilometre against 0.0206 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0016 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Estonia ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 200 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0243 kt per square kilometre 0.0243 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0217 kt per square kilometre 0.0217 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre 0.0207 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0167 kt per square kilometre 0.0206 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Estonia or Guinea-Bissau?
Estonia, at 0.0222 kt per square kilometre against 0.0206 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0016 kt per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Estonia ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guinea-bissau/">Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.