Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.0206 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0231 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
50th
Sweden rank
47th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Sweden
00.010.020.03199020062023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0231 kt per square kilometre against 0.0206 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0025 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 47th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0243 kt per square kilometre 0.0225 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0217 kt per square kilometre 0.0191 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0207 kt per square kilometre 0.0255 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0206 kt per square kilometre 0.0234 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0231 kt per square kilometre against 0.0206 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Sweden?
0.0025 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sweden?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Sweden rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/sweden/">Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.