Mauritania vs Namibia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.0007 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
88th
Namibia rank
90th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 6.0 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 90th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0128 kt per square kilometre 0.0121 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Namibia?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 90th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.