Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Mauritius
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
94th
New Caledonia rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Caledonia
00.010.020.030.040.05199020062023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre —
2000s 0.041 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.041 kt per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0097 kt per square kilometre 0.0042 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
Mauritius, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.