Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)

Australia and New Zealand
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Timor-Leste
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Timor-Leste rank
2nd

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
0200400199120082025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 2nd of 161 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s 1.9 % change on previous year 0.0003 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s 33.2 % change on previous year -0.0001 % change on previous year 33.2 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2020s -14.15 % change on previous year -6.57 % change on previous year 7.58 % change on previous year Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
0 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Timor-Leste ranks 2nd of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 5,353 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.