Belarus vs Montserrat: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Belarus
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Montserrat
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Belarus rank
106th
Montserrat rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Belarus
- Montserrat
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montserrat, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Montserrat has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 106th and Montserrat ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Montserrat | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | -50 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Belarus or Montserrat?
- Belarus, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montserrat as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Belarus and Montserrat?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Montserrat?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2001.
- How do Belarus and Montserrat rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Belarus ranks 106th and Montserrat ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.