Belgium vs New Caledonia: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Belgium
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Belgium rank
106th
New Caledonia rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Belgium
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Belgium ranks 106th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Belgium or New Caledonia?
- Belgium, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Belgium ranks 106th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.