Belgium vs Uzbekistan: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Belgium
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Uzbekistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Belgium rank
106th
Uzbekistan rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Belgium
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land), Belgium or Uzbekistan?
- Belgium, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land) between Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2010.
- How do Belgium and Uzbekistan rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest land)?
- Belgium ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.